July 20, 2012

Fixed vs. Variable

English: Mortgage rates historical trends
Mortgage rates historical trends
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
This is the mortgage question that seems to get the most attention so I thought I'd add my two cents to the mix.

The benefits of a fixed rate is simple:  you know exactly what you're going to be paying for the term of the mortgage.  It's the secure choice.  Draw backs of fixed is that you will generally pay more (statistically 88% of the time).  You'll also qualify for more money with a five year fixed because we use the actual rate to qualify you.  Variables and shorter term loans use the Bank of Canada five year posted rate which is about 2% higher.

The benefit of a variable is exactly the reverse:  you generally pay less but you're gambling with the rates.  This becomes a safer bet if you have a good working knowledge of the world economy (or you have a stellar broker like me to advise you:)  A second benefit of a variable is there's no Interest Rate Differential which can cause those really big penalties if you pay it out early.  It'll just be a straight three months interest.

When choosing a mortgage it's important to consider several things.  First of all, how long before you plan to sell or refinance.  If you're going to sell in one year there's no point in a five year fixed.  A shorter term or a variable would be more appropriate or even an open mortgage (no penalties but higher rate) if you're going to sell within a few months.

Let's assume you're going to keep your house for at least five years.  There are three things I consider when deciding what to recommend to a client:  one is the spread between fixed and variable.  Right now it's only about a tenth of a percent so there's not much savings there.  Normally the spread is closer to 1.5% which makes a much bigger difference.

The second thing I consider is where are rates going.  At the time I'm writing this I expect rates to stay low for two to three more years and then start rising.  With very little spread it would only take a single rate hike to undo any savings with the variable.

The third factor is how well can my clients handle a fluctuating payment.  If the payment goes up significantly do they have a savings account or liquid investments to tap into if they get in  trouble?  Have they bought less than they can afford or are they maxing out their income.  The more secure your financial situation  the more you can afford to gamble with saving money.

Another strategy that I like is the one year fixed strategy.  This allows you the flexibility to renew, refinance or sell every year without penalty.  You get rates that are closer (or lower) than variable rates and it provides a lot of flexibility.  It doesn't have the stablity of the five year fixed but it's a highly flexible option that I like especially for investment properties.

And for all you fence-sitters out there, you can enjoy a 50/50 mortgage where half the balance is in a five year fixed and half is in a five year variable.

If you have any questions about your own situation and what would best suit your needs, please call me.  I am always happy to discuss your options.  And remember, my services are free.
Enhanced by Zemanta

July 12, 2012

New Mortgage Regulations for 2012

FINANCE MINISTERS MEETING, DECEMBER 19, 2011, ...
FINANCE MINISTERS MEETING, DECEMBER 19, 2011, VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Photo credit: BC Gov Photos)
Effective July 9th, the Minister of Finance introduced new rules affecting mortgage lending in Canada.  The idea behind these changes is to avoid rapid deflation in the housing market (like the US experienced) by preventing homeowners from taking on as much debt.

The changes include limiting the maximum amortization to 25 years.  The amount you can afford is based on monthly income and payments so a shorter amortization means a larger payment which means you can afford less.

The government has also set a maximum Gross Debt Service Ratio (GDSR) at 39% where before it was unlimited if your beacon score was over 680.  If your beacon score is under 680 then you have always been limited to 35%.  GDSR is the total monthly payments for housing (mortgage, property taxes, heat, and 50% of condo fees).

The effect of these two rules?  Someone with good credit, 5% down payment, and an $80,000 annual income with no debt could conceivably have qualified for a home priced at $608,000 last week.  This week they would shopping for a home worth $476,000.  Certainly a reasonable amount in most markets but it's the difference between a house and an apartment is you're in the Vancouver/Toronto areas.

The third change was to decrease the amount of equity available for refinancing.  If you want to access the equity in your home you can only take out 80% now, down from 85%.

And lastly, if you're in the market for a home worth more than $1 million then you will have to come up with a 20% down payment

These new regulations will be enforced through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) so will only affect high ratio mortgages with less than 20% down payment.

I get a lot of inquiries about whether the down payment rules have changed.  They have not.  You can still purchase your primary residence with 5% down (10% if you're self employed and stating your income).  Everything else requires 20%.

If you have any questions please comment below and I will respond promptly.  There are no stupid questions.
Enhanced by Zemanta

April 6, 2012

The Truth about Rent-to-Owns

MortgageMortgage (Photo credit: 401K)
Rent-to-Own is a popular concept these days.  They are popping up all over the place due to a number of gurus  like Ron LeGrande.  I get a lot of questions about this and it’s a complicated subject so I thought I’d go over some key points to clarify things for those who might be considering entering into a contract like this.

Firstly, Rent-to-Own can be a good thing or it can be bad thing.  You can’t paint them all with one brush.  We are dealing with contract law not statute law so a deal can be written in any way you want.  Now this is good for you natural negotiators out there because you will know that every detail of the contract is negotiable.  Ideally it is an expensive way to finance real estate in the medium term that assumes some risk; therefore, it’s not really suitable for people who can barely afford to own a home.  It is a better option if you have lots of money or income but bad credit or are recently self employed and can’t qualify for a mortgage.

In the grand scheme of real estate finance there are tiers of lending:  At the top is your A lending which is your major banks and mortgage companies.  You have access to the best rates and terms but you need stable employment, good credit, and a down payment.  Next is your B lending which can also be called equity lending as they require more down payment (or equity in the case of a refinance) usually in the realm of 15-35% but they loosen the credit requirements and sometimes don’t require proof of income.  This is used a lot by people who are self employed and have a difficult time documenting their income and people who have equity but bad credit.  Rates will be higher but reasonable.  Next you have C lending which is your private lenders and Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs).  These are mostly used for second and third mortgages which have significantly higher rates and also high equity requirements but they can also do first mortgages.  For the most part they don’t care about the person they’re lending to they care about the property they’re lending on.  There needs to be enough equity to cover the costs associated with foreclosing and selling the property in the case of default and the rate of return makes up for the times they have to do this to get their money back.

And fourth on the list is Rent-to-Owns.  I suppose we could call this D lending.  It is essentially a way for the seller (or investor) to finance the property for you for 1-5 years while retaining title to the property.  Because there are so many ways to write this type of deal anyone considering it should find their own lawyer who deals with rent-to-owns to advise them and look over all the contracts before you sign them.  Working with a mortgage professional is also a good idea as there will likely be a credit improvement component to this as well that will be vitally important.

Rent-to-Own is the common term for a lease option or an agreement for sale.  A lease option is just what it sounds like:  a lease agreement and an option to buy.  An agreement for sale is a purchase contract with possession before closing and the details of the possession agreement appended.  The biggest difference is a Lease Option is an option to buy at the end of the term and you are afforded the rights of a tenant.  An Agreement for Sale is an obligation to buy at the end of the term and you are afforded the rights of a purchaser.  Both have benefits and drawbacks that you'll need to talk to your lawyer about.

That brings us to the two most important things to do if you're considering a rent-to-own:  Get a lawyer who knows about rent-to-own strategies.  Don't just pick a lawyer out of the book but take the time to find one that frequently deals with these types of contracts.  You need qualified legal advise before entering a contract like this.  Secondly, you have to finance it when the term is up and unless you're going to wind up with a 20% down payment then you'll need mortgage insurance.  CMHC requires that the contract include a clause that requires the seller to refund a part of the "option consideration" (the amount that's going toward the purchase) if the buyer is not able to complete the purchase.  They also require market rent to be charged; you can't rent it out for $10 per month.  There is lots of wiggle room in the interpretation of these rules but they need to be considered.

If you're looking at a rent-to-own or interested in finding one please contact me at (780) 996-2655.  I would be happy to look at contracts, advise you, and even help you negotiate a deal for yourself.
Enhanced by Zemanta