July 30, 2012

Buying Your First Investment Property

Property market
Property market (Photo credit: Alan Cleaver)
I bought my first rental property in 2007 and it was one of the most nerve racking things I'd ever done!  It was such a rush I did it again.  My first house cost $29,080 in Saskatchewan and had a reliable tenant in  it already.  It cash flowed nicely but the three I bought after that were a disaster and cost me a bundle.  A good education is expensive I guess.

I'd like to put the knowledge that I've gained out there for any prospective investors so hopefully you can avoid the mistakes I've made.  There are three cardinal rules to a good rental experience:  Cash flow, good tenants, and buying with selling in mind.

The first rule of investment properties is Cash Flow is King!  DO NOT accept a negative cash flow in the hopes that the property value will increase.  Always invest for cash flow.  You'll have to know the rental market quite well and don't count on getting maximum rent either.  You should be able to make money every month even with a lower rent than you expect.  If you intend to hire a professional Property Manager then make them a part of the purchasing process; don't rely on a Realtor to tell you how much rent to expect.  I won't accept a Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) of less than 1.2.  If you don't know what a DSCR is and how to calculate it then you're not done studying.

The second rule of rental properties is A Good Tenant is Worth their Weight in Gold.  Buy a property in a neighborhood or near a major employer that will attract the type of tenant you want.  I love nurses.  They make good money and are professional and that comes with a certain level of responsibility.  There's really only two things you want from a tenant:  pay rent on time and maintain the value of your asset.  Take your time to find a good one, do your credit and reference checks and trust your gut; it'll be worth the effort.

The third rule is Buy with Selling in Mind.  You need to have an exit strategy (preferably several) from the beginning.  Even if your plan is to keep it until your kids retire you still want to have back up plans.  If you buy a property that is discounted and well below the neighborhoods price ceiling then you could fix it up and refinance, or flip it, or do a rent to own to a tenant buyer who wants to put in some sweat equity in lieu of a down payment.  You have options!

If you respect these three rules you're far more likely to have a great landlording experience.  There are many other things you'll need including a good lease, a good lawyer, an exceptional mortgage broker, and enough cash to keep things moving.

Some other things to keep in mind are:  real estate is all about location, location, location.  Don't ever purchase in a bad location no matter how good a deal it seems to be.  You don't want to buy someone else's problem.

Keep mainstream; I only buy two bedroom apartments and three bedroom, two bath houses or townhouses.  I avoid condominiums as I like to have total control and hate paying condo fees.

Never buy anything you haven't seen yourself (yes, I've done that and it's a bad idea).  You get a different perspective on a property when you're standing inside it yourself.

Trust only your own judgement.  Allow others to advise you but not make decisions for you.

Keep enough cash on hand to deal with at least two major maintenance issues at once including loss of revenues during the repair time.  Smart investors don't over-leverage themselves.  They know they can handle their investment for the long term and so will never become the desperate seller.

And last but certainly not least, stick close to home.  Invest where you can get in your car and deal with a problem yourself.  It's convenient and you know the market better.  You'll also learn a lot by doing the property management yourself to start.

If you're interested in purchasing an investment property and would like coaching or a second opinion on a deal, I'm always happy to help.
Enhanced by Zemanta

July 27, 2012

Will my Amortization change at Renewal?

Prime Minister Stephen Harper
Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Photo credit: University of Saskatchewan)
No.

This is a question I keep hearing since the government has reduced the maximum amortization.  The answer is no it won't.  If you renew with your current lender then nothing will change.

If you change lending institutions at renewal (called a switch) it's the same contract and all the terms must be honoured by the new lender; although a new lender will have to re-qualify you using the new debt ratios.

If you decide to refinance or take equity out of your home then you are creating a new contract which would then be subject to the new rules.

It's also important to remember that these rules only apply to high ratio mortgages which had less than 20% down payment or equity at origination.  The lenders get to choose their own policies for conventional mortgages.

Questions about renewing or switching - call me.  I'm never too busy to talk real estate!
Enhanced by Zemanta

July 20, 2012

Fixed vs. Variable

English: Mortgage rates historical trends
Mortgage rates historical trends
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
This is the mortgage question that seems to get the most attention so I thought I'd add my two cents to the mix.

The benefits of a fixed rate is simple:  you know exactly what you're going to be paying for the term of the mortgage.  It's the secure choice.  Draw backs of fixed is that you will generally pay more (statistically 88% of the time).  You'll also qualify for more money with a five year fixed because we use the actual rate to qualify you.  Variables and shorter term loans use the Bank of Canada five year posted rate which is about 2% higher.

The benefit of a variable is exactly the reverse:  you generally pay less but you're gambling with the rates.  This becomes a safer bet if you have a good working knowledge of the world economy (or you have a stellar broker like me to advise you:)  A second benefit of a variable is there's no Interest Rate Differential which can cause those really big penalties if you pay it out early.  It'll just be a straight three months interest.

When choosing a mortgage it's important to consider several things.  First of all, how long before you plan to sell or refinance.  If you're going to sell in one year there's no point in a five year fixed.  A shorter term or a variable would be more appropriate or even an open mortgage (no penalties but higher rate) if you're going to sell within a few months.

Let's assume you're going to keep your house for at least five years.  There are three things I consider when deciding what to recommend to a client:  one is the spread between fixed and variable.  Right now it's only about a tenth of a percent so there's not much savings there.  Normally the spread is closer to 1.5% which makes a much bigger difference.

The second thing I consider is where are rates going.  At the time I'm writing this I expect rates to stay low for two to three more years and then start rising.  With very little spread it would only take a single rate hike to undo any savings with the variable.

The third factor is how well can my clients handle a fluctuating payment.  If the payment goes up significantly do they have a savings account or liquid investments to tap into if they get in  trouble?  Have they bought less than they can afford or are they maxing out their income.  The more secure your financial situation  the more you can afford to gamble with saving money.

Another strategy that I like is the one year fixed strategy.  This allows you the flexibility to renew, refinance or sell every year without penalty.  You get rates that are closer (or lower) than variable rates and it provides a lot of flexibility.  It doesn't have the stablity of the five year fixed but it's a highly flexible option that I like especially for investment properties.

And for all you fence-sitters out there, you can enjoy a 50/50 mortgage where half the balance is in a five year fixed and half is in a five year variable.

If you have any questions about your own situation and what would best suit your needs, please call me.  I am always happy to discuss your options.  And remember, my services are free.
Enhanced by Zemanta

July 12, 2012

New Mortgage Regulations for 2012

FINANCE MINISTERS MEETING, DECEMBER 19, 2011, ...
FINANCE MINISTERS MEETING, DECEMBER 19, 2011, VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA (Photo credit: BC Gov Photos)
Effective July 9th, the Minister of Finance introduced new rules affecting mortgage lending in Canada.  The idea behind these changes is to avoid rapid deflation in the housing market (like the US experienced) by preventing homeowners from taking on as much debt.

The changes include limiting the maximum amortization to 25 years.  The amount you can afford is based on monthly income and payments so a shorter amortization means a larger payment which means you can afford less.

The government has also set a maximum Gross Debt Service Ratio (GDSR) at 39% where before it was unlimited if your beacon score was over 680.  If your beacon score is under 680 then you have always been limited to 35%.  GDSR is the total monthly payments for housing (mortgage, property taxes, heat, and 50% of condo fees).

The effect of these two rules?  Someone with good credit, 5% down payment, and an $80,000 annual income with no debt could conceivably have qualified for a home priced at $608,000 last week.  This week they would shopping for a home worth $476,000.  Certainly a reasonable amount in most markets but it's the difference between a house and an apartment is you're in the Vancouver/Toronto areas.

The third change was to decrease the amount of equity available for refinancing.  If you want to access the equity in your home you can only take out 80% now, down from 85%.

And lastly, if you're in the market for a home worth more than $1 million then you will have to come up with a 20% down payment

These new regulations will be enforced through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) so will only affect high ratio mortgages with less than 20% down payment.

I get a lot of inquiries about whether the down payment rules have changed.  They have not.  You can still purchase your primary residence with 5% down (10% if you're self employed and stating your income).  Everything else requires 20%.

If you have any questions please comment below and I will respond promptly.  There are no stupid questions.
Enhanced by Zemanta

April 6, 2012

The Truth about Rent-to-Owns

MortgageMortgage (Photo credit: 401K)
Rent-to-Own is a popular concept these days.  They are popping up all over the place due to a number of gurus  like Ron LeGrande.  I get a lot of questions about this and it’s a complicated subject so I thought I’d go over some key points to clarify things for those who might be considering entering into a contract like this.

Firstly, Rent-to-Own can be a good thing or it can be bad thing.  You can’t paint them all with one brush.  We are dealing with contract law not statute law so a deal can be written in any way you want.  Now this is good for you natural negotiators out there because you will know that every detail of the contract is negotiable.  Ideally it is an expensive way to finance real estate in the medium term that assumes some risk; therefore, it’s not really suitable for people who can barely afford to own a home.  It is a better option if you have lots of money or income but bad credit or are recently self employed and can’t qualify for a mortgage.

In the grand scheme of real estate finance there are tiers of lending:  At the top is your A lending which is your major banks and mortgage companies.  You have access to the best rates and terms but you need stable employment, good credit, and a down payment.  Next is your B lending which can also be called equity lending as they require more down payment (or equity in the case of a refinance) usually in the realm of 15-35% but they loosen the credit requirements and sometimes don’t require proof of income.  This is used a lot by people who are self employed and have a difficult time documenting their income and people who have equity but bad credit.  Rates will be higher but reasonable.  Next you have C lending which is your private lenders and Mortgage Investment Corporations (MICs).  These are mostly used for second and third mortgages which have significantly higher rates and also high equity requirements but they can also do first mortgages.  For the most part they don’t care about the person they’re lending to they care about the property they’re lending on.  There needs to be enough equity to cover the costs associated with foreclosing and selling the property in the case of default and the rate of return makes up for the times they have to do this to get their money back.

And fourth on the list is Rent-to-Owns.  I suppose we could call this D lending.  It is essentially a way for the seller (or investor) to finance the property for you for 1-5 years while retaining title to the property.  Because there are so many ways to write this type of deal anyone considering it should find their own lawyer who deals with rent-to-owns to advise them and look over all the contracts before you sign them.  Working with a mortgage professional is also a good idea as there will likely be a credit improvement component to this as well that will be vitally important.

Rent-to-Own is the common term for a lease option or an agreement for sale.  A lease option is just what it sounds like:  a lease agreement and an option to buy.  An agreement for sale is a purchase contract with possession before closing and the details of the possession agreement appended.  The biggest difference is a Lease Option is an option to buy at the end of the term and you are afforded the rights of a tenant.  An Agreement for Sale is an obligation to buy at the end of the term and you are afforded the rights of a purchaser.  Both have benefits and drawbacks that you'll need to talk to your lawyer about.

That brings us to the two most important things to do if you're considering a rent-to-own:  Get a lawyer who knows about rent-to-own strategies.  Don't just pick a lawyer out of the book but take the time to find one that frequently deals with these types of contracts.  You need qualified legal advise before entering a contract like this.  Secondly, you have to finance it when the term is up and unless you're going to wind up with a 20% down payment then you'll need mortgage insurance.  CMHC requires that the contract include a clause that requires the seller to refund a part of the "option consideration" (the amount that's going toward the purchase) if the buyer is not able to complete the purchase.  They also require market rent to be charged; you can't rent it out for $10 per month.  There is lots of wiggle room in the interpretation of these rules but they need to be considered.

If you're looking at a rent-to-own or interested in finding one please contact me at (780) 996-2655.  I would be happy to look at contracts, advise you, and even help you negotiate a deal for yourself.
Enhanced by Zemanta

February 29, 2012

Understanding Today’s Economic Headlines

There is much confusion these days with what’s really going on with our real estate market and the economy in general.  I thought it might be a good time to address some of these concerns and hopefully clear up some uncertainty for my friends and clients.  I’ll start with the economics as that will shed some light on the real estate market.

The economy in Canada is actually quite good.  We haven’t been in recession for a couple of years now but that’s not obvious with the amount of bad news in the media.  Part of the problem is that most people don’t know how to interpret what they’re hearing in the media and that assumes we’re getting correct information in the first place.  The media does have a tendency to report as fact what is really just an educated opinion.  That being said, what follows is also partly the opinion of yours truly.

Guidelines for Interpreting what I hear from the Media

First of all I consider the source of the information.  The government and the banks are frequently truthful but they also have an interest in influencing the psychology of the populace.  If it’s from a press release you can bet it’s been carefully picked over by the PR department.  If it’s a direct quote from someone who knows what they’re talking about it’s more likely to be complete and reliable.  I tend towards independent economists, particularly those who’ve previously held high positions within the government or banks but no longer have the constrictions of a bureaucracy.

Second I consider the jurisdiction of the market.  The “Canadian Real Estate Market” is a useless reference.  Real estate is so local that even the average price in a city is not terribly accurate if you’re considering one particular property.  Prices can change from one street to the next so the “Canadian Market” does not really exist.  The stock market on the other hand is global with a national tilt to the country where it’s located.  The NYSE will affect us all but none more than the US.  The TSX will affect Canada more than anyone else.  Interest rates are national so they will affect the economy of the particular country they’re reporting about; same with inflation.  So it’s important to remember what is going to affect you and the markets you’re involved in.

Considering the timeline of the things reported can be helpful too.  For instance, real estate is not a liquid asset so it takes months for changes to take effect.  Employment is usually the last factor to change in an economy and is therefore a good example of long term strength or weakness.  Businesses need to see a change in their long term financial statements before starting cutbacks or expansion.  The stock markets; however, are extremely liquid and can change significantly overnight.  The media only reports what has already happened.  The performance of the last quarter may have little relevance to the performance of the next quarter.  Some markets (like real estate) also have seasonal cycles; real estate taking a dip in the fall is hardly news – it happens every year.

Predicting the Future

When predicting the future even the smartest have been less accurate in the last few years.  I always want to know the causes that the expert is referencing to formulate their prediction.  Anyone who is using only short term (meaning last few years) government and financial policy factors I don’t put much faith in.  Long term history shows that we’ve had one depression and two major recessions every eighty years or so since the beginning of the industrial age.  Look to the past for a pattern (the human aspect) and adjust for the things that have changed since the last time.  The patterns we’ve seen in the last decade were the same as the 1920’s almost to a tee.  However, there are also some major fundamental changes such as leaving the gold standard; the government can manipulate our currency now.  Another is moving from the industrial age to the information age which has changed the control of the money supply. 

Banks and Government no longer Control the Money

Due to technology moving so fast, information age corporations don’t usually invest in new technology unless it can pay for itself in six months to three years which equates to a 33-200% rate of return.  The net result of this is that major corporations are flush with cash and need something to do with it.  You’ve probably noticed in the last 10 years that every major business has a financing department or a store credit card.  Large corporations now call each other for short term loans instead of asking the banks.  In real estate this has manifested itself in the form of “securitizing” loans.  Banks don’t have enough money to lend so they package up a group of mortgages and sell them off on the bond market.  This was a major contributor to the housing crises in the US due to carelessness of the lenders and buyers of those assets.  Lenders knew they weren’t keeping them and the federal government implemented policies to help even the least credit worthy (subprime) to realize the American Dream of owning a home.  That combined with the demographic issues we’re a recipe for disaster.

Demographics and Debt

The two main causes of the state of our global financial situation are demographics and a massive amount of debt held by individual households and governments; although most major corporations have well balanced financial statements due to the phenomenon noted above.  Globally, the majority of baby boomers have passed their spending peak.  The economy cannot help but slow down from that.  It was inevitable.  Also, incredibly cheap debt in the last decade fuelled unequalled expansion (and in many cases bubbles) all around the world and the time has come to pay the pied piper.

As I said before, Canada is doing quite well.  Only Germany has a stronger economy.  Our suffering has and will be caused by the delinquencies of our neighbours in a global economy.  The US has stabilized but is very vulnerable still to outside influences.  Europe is where things may fall first.  I believe we are likely to see the end of the European Union followed by the collapse of the weakest economies involved.  This will have a domino effect across Europe and the rest of the developed world and finally the US.  If this happens it will be the permanent end to the American empire.  Canada will mostly feel  the effects by having fewer customers to purchase our products.  Exports will go down and business will have to cut back, unemployment will go up, wages will be cut.  Default rates will increase causing drops in real estate and losses for the financial institutions, et cetera.

Deflation - Increased Spending Power

One of the biggest things that could hurt individuals in Canada is deflation.  We’re all familiar with how inflation eats into our spending power but when it reverses to deflation the opposite happens:  prices go down.  Doesn’t seem so bad, right?  But there’s a flip side.  The house and RV you financed with cheap credit just dropped in value but you’re still repaying that debt with money that’s worth more and more as your assets fall faster them you can pay them off.  Also, lower prices can eat into the profits of businesses causing cutbacks and layoffs.  A lot of the rosy economic forecasts revolve around oil staying at or above $85 a barrel; I think we’ll see $40 at some point.  I predict that most commodities will drop as demand for them decreases.  Natural gas has already declined and is predicted to stay low.  Deflation can destroy an economy just as surely as inflation.  This is why Alberta is the place to be – lots of jobs plus lower prices equals a good standard of living. 

This is a good time to refer back to the jurisdiction factor.  If Alberta is doing well and the rest of the world is sinking we could see inflation in real estate but prices for fuel, food, and utilities could drop.  Interest rates might go up but employment will be okay.  Foreign investment may continue to flood in but the stock and commodities markets will take a dive.

Our Real Estate Market

Alberta is in a unique position to survive all of the things that are plaguing the world’s economies.  As I’ve said, the two fundamental issues is demographics and out of control debt levels.  In Alberta we have a very young population.  People don’t come here to retire they come here to work, resulting in the majority of our population being aged between 20 and 45.  Those are peak earning years.  We also have very low government debt.  There are also some other perks like we have the lowest taxes in Canada and our low population of elderly will make less strain on our health care system than in other provinces.  Also, we have two major cities that are in the sweet spot for real estate growth.  Cities between 750,000 and one million tend to grow quite quickly as they are big enough to offer most of the benefits of a big city but are still small enough that they don’t have issues of a big city such as traffic congestion and really high density.  This combination results in a higher growth rate than smaller or larger cities.

All this combines to make Alberta the place to be for the next decade.  If there were no other factors to consider I think that Alberta’s economy would be stable as our fundamental strength battled foreign weakness; however, there’s one more phenomenon.  There are lots of people in all those faltering economies that have vast sums of cash and are looking for somewhere to invest it.  They are already turning to Alberta; we’ve had billions in foreign investment flooding in and it will only pick up if things get worse elsewhere.

Interest Rates

Banks set their prime rate based on the overnight lending rate set by the Bank of Canada (currently 1%).  The government uses this to stimulate or retard the economy and I believe they will have reason to keep it low until the worst of the global deleveraging is over or about 2-3 years.

Fixed rates are based on the bond market where mortgages are securitized.  The bond market is the “safe” place to invest your money when everything else is volatile.  As such the last while of record low interest rates are due to volatility elsewhere causing a glut of capital available in the bond market.  As global economies recover much of that cash will depart to other investments that have higher returns and interest rates will go up.  Again I think we’ve got 2-3 years of low rates ahead after which we’ll see rates return to 5.5 – 6%.

Why we love Alberta (even if it's cold)

Fundamentally, Alberta is the model of a free market system fulfilling its potential.  We would be booming again if the rest of the world was doing okay but we’re going to have to settle for normal growth instead.  Whatever happens, we’re going to do better than the rest of the world.  If they crash, we may stand static until they’ve finished dropping.  If they do better than expected, we may see a small boom return.  Likely, we’ll see moderate growth until things work themselves out globally and the rest of the world deleverages which should take until the end of the decade.  In real estate this will mean a 2.5-5% growth rate per year; during inflation of 2.5% that’s not so good but if we see deflation of 2.5% you can add that to your returns.

I'd love to hear your comments on this one.